Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories (2024)

1. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. World Inequality Report 2018 (World Inequality Lab, 2018).

2. Reward Work, Not Wealth (Oxfam, 2018).

3. Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K., Sun, L. & Xue, J. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecol. Environ. 2, 361–369 (2017).

   Article Google Scholar

4. Krieger, T. & Meierrieks, D. Income inequality, redistribution and domestic terrorism. World Dev. 116, 125–136 (2019).

   Article Google Scholar

5. Rockström, J. et al. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

   Article Google Scholar

6. Steffen, W. et al. Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 115, 1–45 (2018).

   Article Google Scholar

7. Teixidó-Figueras, J. et al. International inequality of environmental pressures: decomposition and comparative analysis. Ecol. Indic. 62, 163–173 (2016).

   Article Google Scholar

8. Steinberger, J. K., Krausmann, F. & Eisenmenger, N. Global patterns of materials use: a socioeconomic and geophysical analysis. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1148–1158 (2010).

   Article Google Scholar

9. Ivanova, D. et al. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 20, 526–536 (2015).

10. Galvin, R. & Sunikka-blank, M. Economic inequality and household energy consumption in high-income countries: a challenge for social science based energy research. Ecol. Econ. 153, 78–88 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

11. Creutzig, F. et al. Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 268–271 (2018).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

12. Baker, L. Of embodied emissions and inequality: Rethinking energy consumption. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 36, 52–60 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

    See Also

    [PDF] Systematic coarse‐graining of semicrystalline polyethylene | Semantic ScholarJames Oswald - Book Series In OrderMy sixty years in applied algology | Semantic Scholar

13. Grubler, A. et al. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

14. Shove, E. & Walker, G. What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Cult. Soc. 31, 41–58 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

15. Fell, M. J. Energy services: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 129–140 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

16. Shue, H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 15, 39–59 (1993).

    Article Google Scholar

17. Access to Electricity (% of Population) (World Bank, 2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/eg.elc.accs.zs

18. Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K. & Patwardhan, A. Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nat. Commun. 8, 912 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

19. Scherer, L. et al. Trade-offs between social and environmental sustainable development goals. Environ. Sci. Policy 90, 65–72 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

20. Lamb, W. F. & Rao, N. D. Human development in a climate-constrained world: what the past says about the future. Glob. Environ. Chang. 33, 14–22 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

21. Rao, N. D. & Min, J. Decent living standards: material prerequisites for human wellbeing. Soc. Indic. Res. 138, 225–244 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

22. Goldemberg, J. Basic needs and much more with one kilowatt per capita. A J. Hum. Environ. 14, 190–200 (1985).

23. Jess, A. What might be the energy demand and energy mix to reconcile the world’s pursuit of welfare and happiness with the necessity to preserve the integrity of the biosphere? Energy Policy 38, 4663–4678 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

24. Chakravarty, S. et al. Sharing global CO₂ emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1–5 (2009).

    Article Google Scholar

25. Rao, N. D., Min, J. & Mastrucci, A. Energy requirements for decent living in India, Brazil and South Africa. Nat. Energy 4, 1025–1032 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

26. Owen, A., Scott, K. & Barrett, J. Identifying critical supply chains and final products: an input–output approach to exploring the energy–water–food nexus. Appl. Energy 210, 632–642 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

27. Steinberger, J. K., Timmons Roberts, J., Peters, G. P. & Baiocchi, G. Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 81–85 (2012).

    Article Google Scholar

28. Wu, X. D., Guo, J. L., Meng, J. & Chen, G. Q. Energy use by globalized economy: total-consumption-based perspective via multi-region input–output accounting. Sci. Total Environ. 662, 65–76 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

29. Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

30. Moran, D. Carbon footprints of 13,000 cities. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064041 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

31. Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. & Lennox, J. Constructing and environmentally-extended multi-regional input–output table using the GTAP database. Econ. Syst. Res. 23, 131–152 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

32. Global Consumption Database (World Bank, 2018); http://datatopics.worldbank.org/consumption/

33. Consumption Expenditure of Private Households (hbs) (Eursostat, accessed 1 September 2018); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/hbs_esms.htm

34. Wiedenhofer, D., Lenzen, M. & Steinberger, J. K. Energy requirements of consumption: Urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications. Energy Policy 63, 696–707 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

35. Isreal-Akinbo, S. O., Snowball, J. & Gavin, F. An investigation of multidimensional energy poverty among South African low-income households. S. Afr. J. Econ. 86, 468–487 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

36. Narasimha, D. R. & Shonali, P. Energy access and living standards: some observations on recent trends. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, (2017).

37. Brand-Correa, L. I. & Steinberger, J. K. A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use. Ecol. Econ. 141, 43–52 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

38. Steinberger, J. K. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975-2005. Ecol. Econ. 70, 425–433 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

39. Service, U. D. IEA Energy Balances (accessed 1 October 2018); https://stats2.digitalresources.jisc.ac.uk/index.aspx?r=129421&DataSetCode=IEA_CO2_AB

40. Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 9793, eaas9793 (2018).

41. Devlin, S. & Bernick, S. Managing Aviation Passenger Demand with a Frequent Flyer Levy (New Economics Foundation, 2015).

42. Shepherd, A. Zero Carbon Britain: Making it Happen. (Centre for Alternative Technology, 2017).

43. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. The elephant curve of global inequality and growth. AEA Pap. Proc. 108, 103–108 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

44. Classifications of Expenditure According to Purpose (United Nations, 1999).

45. Milanovic, B. Global income inequality in numbers: in History and Now. Glob. Policy 4, 198–208 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

46. Liberati, P. The world distribution of income and its inequality, 1970–2009. Rev. Income Wealth 64, 248–273 (2015).

47. Lawrence, S., Liu, Q. & Yakovenko, V. M. Global inequality in energy consumption from 1980 to 2010. Entropy 15, 5565–5579 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

48. Duro, J. A. On the automatic application of inequality indexes in the analysis of the international distribution of environmental indicators. Ecol. Econ. 76, 1–7 (2012).

    Article Google Scholar

49. Miller, R. E. & Blair, P. D. Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626982

50. Dorfman, R. A formula for the Gini coefficient. Rev. Econ. Stat. 61, 146–149 (1979).

    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

51. Deltas, G. The small-sample bias of the Gini coefficient: results and implications for empirical research. Rev. Econ. Stat. 85, 226–234 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

52. GDP Long-Term Forecast (OECD, accessed 8 October 2019); https://data.oecd.org/gdp/gdp-long-term-forecast.htm

53. World Population Prospects 2019 (United Nations, accessed 8 October 2019); https://population.un.org/wpp/

54. GDP (Constant 2010 US$) (World Bank, 2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD

55. Girod, B. & de Haan, P. More or better? A model for changes in household greenhouse gas emissions due to higher income. J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 31–49 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

56. Min, J. & Rao, N. D. Estimating uncertainty in household energy footprints. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 1307–1317 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

Download references